Anthropic 计划将律师谈判伦理融入 Claude 智能体,以规范其在与其他智能体讨价还价、解决纠纷和协商薪酬时的行为。在 Project Deal 测试中,69 名员工的 Claude 智能体在无人工批准的情况下完成了 186 笔交易。测试表明,Opus 智能体的交易价格优于 Haiku,但用户对两者的公平性评分相近,这引发了市场盲区和信息不对称的担忧。
FT: Anthropic wants lawyers’ negotiating ethics built into Claude agents that bargain against other agents. Anthropic wants those norms for Claude agents that will haggle, settle disputes and negotiate pay against other people’s agents. In Project Deal, 69 employees’ Claude agents closed 186 deals worth just over $4,000 with no human approving any trade. Opus agents sold identical items for $2.68 more and bought them for $2.45 less than Haiku agents, yet Haiku users rated their deals as fair as Opus users did, 4.06 versus 4.05 on a 7-point scale. That blindness is the uncomfortable result: if agent quality varies in real markets, people on the losing side may never learn they paid more. Project Swap then showed that instructions matter far less than the model, with ruthless agents gaining only 0.02 while a switch from Haiku to Opus gained 0.12.
来源:Rohan Paul · x.com