跳到正文
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X·· 3 小时前AI 评分65
AI 导读

Google 新研究推出了物理工程基准 PLE,测试发现当前最强智能体在该基准上的平均得分仅为 50.6%。PLE 包含 85 个由工程师编写或审核的电气、土木、结构和机械工程任务,Claude Opus 5.5 在 Claude Code 中以 50.6% 的得分名列 14 款模型之首,但其在处理复杂设计时常因遗漏硬性安全或可行性规则而失分。

正文 · 原文

New Google paper finds that the best AI agent scores only 50.6% on physical engineering jobs, often by missing a hard safety or feasibility rule.

Engineering benchmarks for LLMs mostly test textbook questions or toy problems that top agents already handle well. Real engineers work from piles of PDFs, spreadsheets, and CAD files and must issue designs that meet code and stay cheap.

They built PLE, 85 electrical, civil, structural, and mechanical jobs written or checked by practising engineers. Agents must read about 61 project files per task and deliver schedules, reports, or 2D and 3D drawings.

Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code topped 14 models at 50.6%, using 27M tokens and 63 minutes per task. On design tasks its outputs met 91% of constraints, but only 41.3% met every hard constraint.

If you build engineering agents, gate every design on hard safety and code limits, and spend effort on model choice before tuning the agent scaffold.

来源:Rohan Paul · x.com