特拉华州拟允许 AI 智能体经营公司,美国众议员调查其免责风险
美国众议员 James Comer 致信特拉华州州长,对该州拟允许创建由 AI 智能体运营公司的计划展开调查,担忧此举会让公司人类所有者逃避 AI 带来的法律责任。该提案计划设立 30 个月的监管沙盒测试智能体商业活动,而支持者则认为通过赋予自主系统法律身份可使其纳入法律监管。
Manage your consent preferences
If you are a resident of Colorado, Connecticut, Virginia, Utah, Oregon, Texas, Montana, Delaware, Iowa, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and New Jersey, Tennessee, Minnesota, Maryland, Indiana, Kentucky, or Rhode Island you have the right to opt-out of Targeted Advertising, including our “sale” and/or “sharing” of your Personal Information (“Opt-Out”). We and our third-party business partners use Personal Information in accordance with our Privacy Policy to serve advertising believed to be of interest to you (“Targeted Advertising”). If you are a California resident, you also have the right to limit the use and disclosure of your Sensitive Personal information in particular circumstances. Please note that you may need to Opt-Out on each website, mobile app, browser, and device you use, and if you clear your browser cookies, you may need to repeat this process. However, if you have created an account to log in across several of our websites and/or mobile apps, we will make reasonable efforts to apply your Opt-Out request to each of those websites and apps. ◦ To Opt-Out of Targeted Advertising on this site: Move the “Allow Targeted Advertising" toggle below to the left and press “Confirm My Choices”◦ To Opt-Out of other “sales”, including for list rentals, data co-ops, and to limit the use and disclosure of your Sensitive Personal Information: Please email privacy_administration@condenast.com or call 1-877-241-4999.
Essential
- On
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.
Performance
- On
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
Audience Measurement
- On
We use audience measurement cookies in order to carry out aggregated traffic measurement and generate performance statistics essential for the proper functioning of the site and the provision of its content (for example to measure performance, to detect navigation problems, to optimization technical performance or ergonomics, to estimate server power needed and to analyse content performance). The use of these cookies is strictly limited to measuring the site's audience. These cookies do not allow the tracking of navigation on other websites and the data collected is not combined or shared with third parties. You can refuse the use of this cookie by switching off the slider to the right.
Functional
- On
This website uses functional cookies and services to remember your preferences and choices, such as language preferences, font sizes, region selections, and customized layouts. They enable this website to offer enhanced and personalized functionalities.
Social Media
- Off
These cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.
Allow Sale/Targeted Advertising?
- On
We may transfer or share your personal information to third parties for the purposes of targeted advertising. You can learn more about what information is used for this purpose in our privacy notice.
Confirm My Choices Reject All Accept All
Skip to contentArs Technica home
Sections
Story text
Size Width * Links
- Subscribers only
Learn more
Pin to story
Theme
- HyperLight
- Day & Night
- Dark
- System
Sign In
Sign in dialog...
Sign in
Meet the new boss
“No human at the helm”: Delaware plan would let AI agents run entire businesses
Owners of AI-run firms would evade liability for “reckless” AI, US Rep. Comer says.
Jon Brodkin – Oct 27, 2026 9:50 PM|2
Credit: Getty Images | Thamrongpat Theerathammakorn
Credit: Getty Images | Thamrongpat Theerathammakorn
Text settings
Story text
Size Width * Links
- Subscribers only
Learn more
Minimize to nav
A Delaware proposal to let companies be operated by AI agents would help the firms’ human owners evade legal responsibility for reckless and harmful actions taken by the AI, US Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) told Delaware Governor Matt Meyer in a letter yesterday.
Comer, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, told Meyer that the committee “seeks assistance obtaining documents related to your state administration’s efforts to establish a new form of corporate entity to be known as an Artificial Intelligence Company (AIC).”
Comer said the proposal is ripe for abuse. “We are concerned that Delaware’s AIC proposal could be used to protect powerful AI companies and their investors from responsibility for reckless harmful actions, while also protecting non-transparent forces seeking anticompetitive regulatory capture behind state AI initiatives,” Comer’s letter said.
Comer suggested he may propose a federal law that would limit states’ regulatory authority. He said the committee’s probe of Delaware’s plan would “inform possible federal legislative efforts including proposals to appropriately limit state AI regulatory initiatives.” Citing the Oversight Committee’s “jurisdiction to study intergovernmental relationships including those of states,” Comer asked for documents related to development of the proposal and potential AI safety risks.
AI-run companies could operate in just about any industry except banking. “An AIC may have any lawful purpose, regardless of whether for profit, except for the business of banking,” according to a draft bill that may be submitted to the Delaware state legislature.
Ars Video
How Lighting Design In The Callisto Protocol Elevates The Horror
The draft bill says AI agents could be “designated to manage the business and affairs, and to conduct the business, of the AIC.” The bill proposes a “regulatory sandbox” that would exist for 30 months to test the idea. Allowing AI-run companies would bring more revenue via taxes and fees to Delaware, which is already a top destination for business entities of all sizes.
“The answer is to wrap AI in legal form”
In July 2026, Delaware’s Secretary of State Charuni Patibanda-Sanchez co-wrote an op-ed in Fortune announcing the proposal. The op-ed said that “nothing in the law of several states clearly prevents an AI agent from operating a company with no human at the helm,” and that states should develop legal frameworks for autonomous software that is able to contract, pay suppliers, and make transactions with no human involvement.
“The answer is not to try to prohibit the activity; any effort to do so is just as unlikely to succeed as the technology and its enablers are likely to push the boundaries of the law,” the op-ed said. “The answer is to wrap AI in legal form. Give an autonomous system a recognizable legal identity and you make it legible to law. You create a defined target to which responsibility and damages can attach. You make the agent’s conduct visible, traceable, and accountable.”
The op-ed explained how an AI-run company will shield humans from legal liabilities:
A Delaware AIC will be a separate legal entity whose day-to-day affairs are managed by an AI agent rather than a person. At the agent’s direction, the AIC can sue and be sued in its own name, hold and dispose of property, and incur obligations. It has a single member, a person or an entity, responsible for keeping the AIC adequately capitalized, and the AIC must keep a log of its activities. That member is shielded from the AIC’s debts, except where it fails to capitalize the company or uses it to commit fraud or a willful violation of law.
Under the proposed law, the “member” is an individual or a corporation that would fund the AI-run company and benefit from any profits, but designate an AI agent to manage the actual business. The draft bill says, “The member is not liable for any act or omission that the AIC takes or fails to take, or that another person takes or fails to take at the direction of the AIC.” There are exceptions for when a person uses the AI-run company “to engage in fraud or any willful violation of law,” or “caused or allowed the AIC to conduct business when the member knew or should have known the conduct was outside the AIC’s statement of purpose.”
Citing Patibanda-Sanchez’s announcement, Comer wrote that an AI-run company would provide “the human or entity capitalizing the AIC with liability protections from potential harms to business partners, consumers, and the public, perpetrated by the controlling AI.”
A spokesperson for Gov. Meyer told Ars today that “we have received the letter and are in the process of reviewing it.” A spokesperson for Patibanda-Sanchez declined to comment, saying that the governor’s office is handling press requests on the matter.
Patibanda-Sanchez’s op-ed said Delaware’s planned regulatory sandbox will “pilot agentic commerce in daylight, under supervision, with capital tied to liability and the ability to shut a system down.” The 30-month testing period would give the state legislature “a full record for deciding how to legislate” AI-run companies, it said.
Delaware home to most Fortune 500 companies
A future state law allowing AI-operated companies would be especially impactful in Delaware, as about two-thirds of Fortune 500 companies are incorporated in the state. Although Elon Musk now prefers Texas, many corporations choose Delaware for its low corporate taxes and business-friendly legal framework. Patibanda-Sanchez boasts that Delaware provides “the most predictable and business-focused legal home in the world,” and that 334,461 new entities were formed in Delaware in 2025.
Patibanda-Sanchez collaborated on the sandbox plan with a private company that says it makes legal AI agents for businesses. “The framework for industry engagement with AICs is being developed in Delaware as part of a public-private partnership led by Norm Ai,” said the op-ed co-written by Patibanda-Sanchez and Norm Ai founder and CEO John Nay.
Meyer, a Democrat, publicly supported the idea of letting AI agents incorporate in a response to an April 2026 social media post by Mark Cuban. Cuban wrote, “If I was the governor of a state looking to grow their revenues, I would add the ability for anyone to incorporate using an AI agent and stablecoins. And charge a premium for the service. Post the agent in the marketplace/connectors that the big LLMs have, to simplify it for everyone. First to market makes a killing.”
Meyer’s official X account replied, “On it!” and posted a link to Meyer’s July 2025 announcement of the plan for an AI sandbox in which “artificial intelligence technologies can be safely developed and deployed across high-impact sectors, including corporate governance, biotechnology, healthcare, chemicals, and financial services.”
In July 2025, Meyer signed a legislative resolution “to create a regulatory sandbox framework for the testing of innovative and novel technologies that utilize agentic artificial intelligence.” This resulted in the Delaware Artificial Intelligence Commission forming a Sandbox Subcommittee to work on a “draft regulatory framework that would create a regulatory sandbox that would test and evaluate agentic artificial intelligence and its application to corporate governance,” the commission said in its December 2025 annual report.
The commission said the Sandbox Subcommittee was working on “potential draft legislation,” and had received a briefing from Patibanda-Sanchez “on the work of a group she has formed to investigate a potential structure for a regulatory sandbox.”
AI-run firms can do “anything that a company can do”
In June 2026, the draft legislation was detailed in a Spotlight Delaware article that said the bill is likely to be introduced in the state legislature next year. The article said:
The principal drafter of the proposed legislation, John Mark Zeberkiewicz, said the measure could allow AI agents to engage in just about any business activity—from providing coding services to signing contracts, or even filing and defending lawsuits.
He also noted that it seeks to protect owners of new Artificial Intelligence Companies from facing legal liability from actions the AI might take. “Anything that a company can do, the AIC can do as a company,” said Zeberkiewicz, a corporate attorney at Wilmington’s Richards Layton and Finger.
Patibanda-Sanchez said at a Delaware AI Commission meeting in June 2026 that the state would benefit from fees paid to form the new type of AI-run companies, according to the Spotlight Delaware article. “Should a new entity form be created out of it, that’s really a huge benefit to our state’s revenues,” Patibanda-Sanchez was quoted as saying.
UC Berkeley law professor Andrew Baker told the Financial Times that the Delaware proposal seems likely “to be an overly generous liability shield, which seems unwarranted without some underlying policy rationale that hasn’t been developed or justified well.”
Martin Petrin, a law professor at York University in Toronto, told Bloomberg that “other states will likely move ahead with similar proposals to compete in this area. If they are serious about this, a federal framework could help address concerns about safety and a regulatory race to the bottom.”
Jon BrodkinSenior IT Reporter
Jon BrodkinSenior IT Reporter
Jon is a Senior IT Reporter for Ars Technica. He covers the telecom industry, Federal Communications Commission rulemakings, broadband consumer affairs, court cases, and government regulation of the tech industry.
Comments
Loading comments...
Most Read
1.Microsoft offers to buy out a quarter of its workforce
- 2.Highway thieves are spoofing GPS to steal millions in data center-bound cargo
- 3.ICE plan to buy robot dogs spurs protest from hundreds of Boston Dynamics employees
- 4.Some iPhone Duo screens are already failing, Apple says only a "small number" are affected
- 5.Apple releases iOS and macOS 27.2 with new Siri AI features, new Music logo
Customize
Ars Technica has been separating the signal from the noise for over 25 years. With our unique combination of technical savvy and wide-ranging interest in the technological arts and sciences, Ars is the trusted source in a sea of information. After all, you don’t need to know everything, only what’s important.
More from Ars
Contact
Manage Preferences
© 2026 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement and Ars Technica Addendum and Your California Privacy Rights. Ars Technica may earn compensation on sales from links on this site. Read our affiliate link policy. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad Choices
Sign in dialog...
Sign in
来源:Ars Technica:AI · arstechnica.com