跳到正文
Ethan Mollick· @emollick · X·· 3 天前AI 评分64
AI 导读

在一项针对 124 篇哈佛社会科学论文的研究中,Opus 4.8 在各项指标上均表现出优于人类专家同行评审的效果。作者指出,学术界需要迅速思考如何适应将 AI 引入科研实践的变化。

正文 · 原文

By every measure, Opus 4.8 beats human experts as peer reviewers in a study of 124 Harvard social science papers covering a range from statistical analyses to formal models to qualitative work.

As academics, we need to figure out how to adapt the practice of science to AI, fast.

来源:Ethan Mollick · x.com