担忧美国对外国制造机器人禁令波及晶圆厂,Intel 申请并获 FCC 豁免
针对美国政府对外国制造机器人的禁令,Intel 为确保美国芯片工厂能继续使用特定机器人车辆而申请并获得了 FCC 为期一年的豁免。这些通常由日本公司制造的自动化导引车用于在工厂和仓库内搬运物料。Intel 表示,此类外资制造的机器人设备对于美国的半导体生产至关重要。
Manage your consent preferences
If you are a resident of Colorado, Connecticut, Virginia, Utah, Oregon, Texas, Montana, Delaware, Iowa, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and New Jersey, Tennessee, Minnesota, Maryland, Indiana, Kentucky, or Rhode Island you have the right to opt-out of Targeted Advertising, including our “sale” and/or “sharing” of your Personal Information (“Opt-Out”). We and our third-party business partners use Personal Information in accordance with our Privacy Policy to serve advertising believed to be of interest to you (“Targeted Advertising”). If you are a California resident, you also have the right to limit the use and disclosure of your Sensitive Personal information in particular circumstances. Please note that you may need to Opt-Out on each website, mobile app, browser, and device you use, and if you clear your browser cookies, you may need to repeat this process. However, if you have created an account to log in across several of our websites and/or mobile apps, we will make reasonable efforts to apply your Opt-Out request to each of those websites and apps. ◦ To Opt-Out of Targeted Advertising on this site: Move the “Allow Targeted Advertising" toggle below to the left and press “Confirm My Choices”◦ To Opt-Out of other “sales”, including for list rentals, data co-ops, and to limit the use and disclosure of your Sensitive Personal Information: Please email privacy_administration@condenast.com or call 1-877-241-4999.
Essential
- On
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.
Performance
- On
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
Audience Measurement
- On
We use audience measurement cookies in order to carry out aggregated traffic measurement and generate performance statistics essential for the proper functioning of the site and the provision of its content (for example to measure performance, to detect navigation problems, to optimization technical performance or ergonomics, to estimate server power needed and to analyse content performance). The use of these cookies is strictly limited to measuring the site's audience. These cookies do not allow the tracking of navigation on other websites and the data collected is not combined or shared with third parties. You can refuse the use of this cookie by switching off the slider to the right.
Functional
- On
This website uses functional cookies and services to remember your preferences and choices, such as language preferences, font sizes, region selections, and customized layouts. They enable this website to offer enhanced and personalized functionalities.
Social Media
- Off
These cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.
Allow Sale/Targeted Advertising?
- On
We may transfer or share your personal information to third parties for the purposes of targeted advertising. You can learn more about what information is used for this purpose in our privacy notice.
Confirm My Choices Reject All Accept All
Skip to contentArs Technica home
Sections
Story text
Size Width * Links
- Subscribers only
Learn more
Pin to story
Theme
- HyperLight
- Day & Night
- Dark
- System
Sign In
Sign in dialog...
Sign in
Just in case
FCC’s confusing ban on foreign-made robots spurs Intel to obtain waiver
Company says foreign-made robotic vehicles are crucial to US chip production.
Jeremy Hsu – Oct 23, 2026 5:18 PM|0
The interior of Intel's chip manufacturing facility named Fab 52 in Chandler, Arizona. Credit: Intel
The interior of Intel's chip manufacturing facility named Fab 52 in Chandler, Arizona. Credit: Intel
Text settings
Story text
Size Width * Links
- Subscribers only
Learn more
Minimize to nav
US chip champion Intel was so confused by the US government ban on foreign-made robots that it requested and received a waiver “out of an abundance of caution.” The tech company wanted to make sure that it could continue using certain robotic vehicles in its US chip fabs.
The uncertainty surrounding the Federal Communications Commission ban on certain foreign-made robots was revealed in the agency’s decision to grant Intel’s waiver request. On October 22, the FCC published its order allowing Intel to continue using the foreign-made robots in US semiconductor manufacturing facilities for a period of one year.
The robots in question are automated guided vehicles operating on “tracks or predefined paths” while often requiring operator oversight, according to Intel’s website. They help to move materials and items around within warehouses and factory floors.
Such robotic vehicles are typically manufactured by Japanese companies like Murata Machinery and Daifuku Co., according to Bloomberg News. But the exact types of robotic vehicles used by Intel were only identified in a “confidential appendix” that accompanied its request.
The FCC’s ban mainly covers new models of mobile robots, like humanoid robots and robot vacuums, and still allows for the import of robots previously approved for sale in the United States. But the agency rules seem to restrict major modifications to “previously authorized devices.”
Ars Video
How The Callisto Protocol's Gameplay Was Perfected Months Before Release
Intel’s waiver request stated that it was “unclear” whether its robotic vehicles even qualify as robots covered by the FCC ban but said it sought relief just in case. The tech company also received approval to “make certain hardware, software, and firmware changes” that would help ensure the continued operation and maintenance of the robotic vehicles.
The tech company described the robotic vehicles as being “critical to its domestic semiconductor manufacturing operations” and argued that the ability to maintain the robots was crucial to avoiding any disruptions to chip production. It also said there are no US-made alternatives that meet the company’s requirements.
The FCC approval came within a week of when Intel filed its waiver request on October 16. That is not too surprising given the importance of Intel to the Trump administration’s plans for reshoring chip manufacturing—not to mention that the US government took an $8.9 billion equity stake in the chip company.
Meanwhile, the US robotics industry at large is still grappling with the consequences of the FCC ban on foreign-made robots, given that China is the world’s leading supplier of robots and robotic components. Ars previously talked with one US robotics distributor that has pivoted from importing China’s humanoid robots to opening a US manufacturing facility for robots.
Some analysts have warned that the US government’s attempt to boost domestic production of robots via the restrictions on foreign-made robots could backfire for US industry. A report by the market intelligence firm International Data Corporation looks forward to 2030 and estimates that the FCC rule could reduce US revenue from deploying humanoid robots by 58 percent compared to pre-restriction expectations.
Jeremy HsuTech Reporter
Jeremy HsuTech Reporter
Jeremy Hsu is a reporter exploring a wide range of topics across deep tech and AI. He has previously written for New Scientist, Scientific American, IEEE Spectrum, Wired, Undark Magazine and MIT Tech Review, among many other publications, about topics such as deepfakes, data centers, drones, battery tech, robotics, and GPS jamming. He also has a Master of Arts in Journalism from NYU, and a bachelor's degree from University of Pennsylvania in History and Sociology of Science, with a minor in English.
Comments
Loading comments...
Most Read
1.Meta shocked by $25B fine after N.M. refused to join multistate settlement
- 2.Disgraced eMudhra drops out of TLS business after using cert private key of 4
- 3.The Internet goes on high alert after discovery of 8 compromised TLS certs
- 4.Latest estimate for Starship launches required to support a Moon landing? 22.
- 5.Rocket Report: SpaceX says no thanks to military launches; Spanish rocket nearly ready
Customize
Ars Technica has been separating the signal from the noise for over 25 years. With our unique combination of technical savvy and wide-ranging interest in the technological arts and sciences, Ars is the trusted source in a sea of information. After all, you don’t need to know everything, only what’s important.
More from Ars
Contact
Manage Preferences
© 2026 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Use of and/or registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement and Ars Technica Addendum and Your California Privacy Rights. Ars Technica may earn compensation on sales from links on this site. Read our affiliate link policy. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad Choices
Sign in dialog...
Sign in
来源:Ars Technica:AI · arstechnica.com